"Parvus error in principiis, magnus in conclusionibus"
"Parvus error in principio, magnus est in fine"
“A small error in the beginning (or in principles) leads to a big error in the end (or in conclusions).” (ancient axiom)
"The wise tell us that a nail keeps a shoe, a shoe a horse, a horse a man, a man a castle, that can fight." (Freidank, Bescheidenheit, cca. 1230)
"[…] the least initial deviation from the truth is multiplied later a thousand-fold. Admit, for instance, the existence of a minimum magnitude, and you will find that the minimum which you have introduced, small as it is, causes the greatest truths of mathematics to totter. The reason is that a principle is great rather in power than in extent; hence that which was small at the start turns out a giant at the end." (St. Thomas Aquinas, “De Ente et Essentia”, cca. 1252)
"A little neglect may breed mischief [...]
for want of a nail, the shoe was lost;
for want of a shoe the horse was lost;
and for want of a horse the rider was lost." (Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanac, 1758)
"In every moment of her duration Nature is one connected whole; in every moment each individual part must be what it is, because all the others are what they are; and you could not remove a single grain of sand from its place, without thereby, although perhaps imperceptibly to you, altering something throughout all parts of the immeasurable whole." (Johann G Fichte, "The Vocation of Man", 1800)
"Every existence above a certain rank has its singular points; the higher the rank the more of them. At these points, influences whose physical magnitude is too small to be taken account of by a finite being may produce results of the greatest importance." (James C Maxwell, [letter] 1865)
"What we call little things are merely the causes of great things; they are the beginning, the embryo, and it is the point of departure which, generally speaking, decides the whole future of an existence. One single black speck may be the beginning of gangrene, of a storm, of a revolution." (Henri-Frédéric Amiel, [journal entry] 1868)
"There is a maxim which is often quoted, that ‘The same causes will always produce the same effects.’ To make this maxim intelligible we must define what we mean by the same causes and the same effects, since it is manifest that no event ever happens more that once, so that the causes and effects cannot be the same in all respects. [...] There is another maxim which must not be confounded with that quoted at the beginning of this article, which asserts ‘That like causes produce like effects’. This is only true when small variations in the initial circumstances produce only small variations in the final state of the system. In a great many physical phenomena this condition is satisfied; but there are other cases in which a small initial variation may produce a great change in the final state of the system, as when the displacement of the ‘points’ causes a railway train to run into another instead of keeping its proper course." (James C Maxwell,"Matter and Motion", 1876)
"A tenth of a degree more or less at any given point, and the cyclone will burst here and not there." (Henri Poincaré, "Sur le probleme des trios corps et les equations de la dynamique", Acta Mathematica Vol. 113, 1890)
"An exceedingly small cause which escapes our notice determines a considerable effect that we cannot fail to see, and then we say the effect is due to chance. If we knew exactly the laws of nature and the situation of the universe at the initial moment, we could predict exactly the situation of that same universe at a succeeding moment. But even if it were the case that the natural laws had no longer any secret for us, we could still only know the initial situation 'approximately'. If that enabled us to predict the succeeding situation with 'the same approximation', that is all we require, and we should say that the phenomenon had been predicted, that it is governed by laws. But it is not always so; it may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena. A small error in the former will produce an enormous error in the latter. Prediction becomes impossible, and we have the fortuitous phenomenon. (Jules H Poincaré, "Science and Method", 1908)
"Throwing a small stone may have some influence on the movement of the sun." (Grigore C Moisil, "Determinism si inlantuire", 1940)
"The predictions of physical theories for the most part concern situations where initial conditions can be precisely specified. If such initial conditions are not found in nature, they can be arranged." (Anatol Rapoport, "The Search for Simplicity", 1956)
“One meteorologist remarked that if the theory were correct, one flap of a sea gull's wings would be enough to alter the course of the weather forever. The controversy has not yet been settled, but the most recent evidence seems to favor the sea gulls.” (Edward N Lorenz, "The Predictability of Hydrodynamic Flow", Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences 25 (4), 1963)
"Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?" (Edward N Lorenz, [talk] 1972)
"If a single flap of a butterfly's wing can be instrumental in generating a tornado, so all the previous and subsequent flaps of its wings, as can the flaps of the wings of the millions of other butterflies, not to mention the activities of innumerable more powerful creatures, including our own species." (Edward N Lorenz, [talk] 1972)
"If the flap of a butterfly’s wings can be instrumental in generating a tornado, it can equally well be instrumental in preventing a tornado. More generally, I am proposing that over the years minuscule disturbances neither increase nor decrease the frequency of occurrence of various weather events such as tornadoes; the most that they may do is to modify the sequence in which these events occur." (Edward N Lorenz, [talk] 1972)
"[...] the influence of a single butterfly is not only a fine detail-it is confined to a small volume. Some of the numerical methods which seem to be well adapted for examining the intensification of errors are not suitable for studying the dispersion of errors from restricted to unrestricted regions. One hypothesis, unconfirmed, is that the influence of a butterfly's wings will spread in turbulent air, but not in calm air." (Edward N Lorenz, [talk] 1972)
"Given an approximate knowledge of a system's initial conditions and an understanding of natural law, one can calculate the approximate behavior of the system. This assumption lay at the philosophical heart of science." (James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science, 1987)
"The principle of maximum diversity operates both at the physical and at the mental level. It says that the laws of nature and the initial conditions are such as to make the universe as interesting as possible. As a result, life is possible but not too easy. Always when things are dull, something new turns up to challenge us and to stop us from settling into a rut. Examples of things which make life difficult are all around us: comet impacts, ice ages, weapons, plagues, nuclear fission, computers, sex, sin and death. Not all challenges can be overcome, and so we have tragedy. Maximum diversity often leads to maximum stress. In the end we survive, but only by the skin of our teeth." (Freeman Dyson, "Infinite in All Directions", 1988)
“The flapping of a single butterfly’s wing today produces a tiny change in the state of the atmosphere. Over a period of time, what the atmosphere actually does diverges from what it would have done.” (Ian Stewart, "Does God Play Dice?", 1989)
"Although a system may exhibit sensitive dependence on initial condition, this does not mean that everything is unpredictable about it. In fact, finding what is predictable in a background of chaos is a deep and important problem. (Which means that, regrettably, it is unsolved.) In dealing with this deep and important problem, and for want of a better approach, we shall use common sense." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)
"Everywhere […] in the Universe, we discern that closed physical systems evolve in the same sense from ordered states towards a state of complete disorder called thermal equilibrium. This cannot be a consequence of known laws of change, since […] these laws are time symmetric- they permit […] time-reverse. […] The initial conditions play a decisive role in endowing the world with its sense of temporal direction. […] some prescription for initial conditions is crucial if we are to understand […]" (John D Barrow, "Theories of Everything: The Quest for Ultimate Explanation", 1991)
"First, strange attractors look strange: they are not smooth curves or surfaces but have 'non-integer dimension' - or, as Benoit Mandelbrot puts it, they are fractal objects. Next, and more importantly, the motion on a strange attractor has sensitive dependence on initial condition. Finally, while strange attractors have only finite dimension, the time-frequency analysis reveals a continuum of frequencies." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)
"If we have several modes, oscillating independently, the motion is, as we saw, not chaotic. Suppose now that we put a coupling, or interaction, between the different modes. This means that the evolution of each mode, or oscillator, at a certain moment is determined not just by the state of this oscillator at that moment, but by the states of the other oscillators as well. When do we have chaos then? Well, for sensitive dependence on initial condition to occur, at least three oscillators are necessary. In addition, the more oscillators there are, and the more coupling there is between them, the more likely you are to see chaos." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)
"[…] the standard theory of chaos deals with time evolutions that come back again and again close to where they were earlier. Systems that exhibit this "eternal return" are in general only moderately complex. The historical evolution of very complex systems, by contrast, is typically one way: history does not repeat itself. For these very complex systems with one-way evolution it is usually clear that sensitive dependence on initial condition is present. The question is then whether it is restricted by regulation mechanisms, or whether it leads to long-term important consequences." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)
"What we now call chaos is a time evolution with sensitive dependence on initial condition. The motion on a strange attractor is thus chaotic. One also speaks of deterministic noise when the irregular oscillations that are observed appear noisy, but the mechanism that produces them is deterministic." (David Ruelle, "Chance and Chaos", 1991)
"Chaos is a parody of any metaphysics of destiny. It is not even an avatar of such a metaphysics. The poetry of initial conditions fascinates us today, now that we no longer possess a vision of final conditions, and Chaos stands in for us as a negative destiny. [...] Destiny is the ecstatic figure of necessity. Chaos is merely the metastatic figure of Chance. Chaotic processes are random and statistical in nature and, even if they culminate in the hidden order of strange attractors, that still has nothing to do with the fulgurating notion of destiny, the absence of which is cruelly felt." (Jean Baudrillard, "The Illusion of the End", 1992)
"In nonlinear systems - and the economy is most certainly nonlinear - chaos theory tells you that the slightest uncertainty in your knowledge of the initial conditions will often grow inexorably. After a while, your predictions are nonsense." (M Mitchell Waldrop, "Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos", 1992)
"In the everyday world of human affairs, no one is surprised to learn that a tiny event over here can have an enormous effect over there. For want of a nail, the shoe was lost, et cetera. But when the physicists started paying serious attention to nonlinear systems in their own domain, they began to realize just how profound a principle this really was. […] Tiny perturbations won't always remain tiny. Under the right circumstances, the slightest uncertainty can grow until the system's future becomes utterly unpredictable - or, in a word, chaotic." (M Mitchell Waldrop, "Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos", 1992)
"How can deterministic behavior look random? If truly identical states do occur on two or more occasions, it is unlikely that the identical states that will necessarily follow will be perceived as being appreciably different. What can readily happen instead is that almost, but not quite, identical states occurring on two occasions will appear to be just alike, while the states that follow, which need not be even nearly alike, will be observably different. In fact, in some dynamical systems it is normal for two almost identical states to be followed, after a sufficient time lapse, by two states bearing no more resemblance than two states chosen at random from a long sequence. Systems in which this is the case are said to be sensitively dependent on initial conditions. With a few more qualifications, to be considered presently, sensitive dependence can serve as an acceptable definition of chaos [...]" (Edward N Lorenz, "The Essence of Chaos", 1993)
"Symmetry breaking in psychology is governed by the nonlinear causality of complex systems (the 'butterfly effect'), which roughly means that a small cause can have a big effect. Tiny details of initial individual perspectives, but also cognitive prejudices, may 'enslave' the other modes and lead to one dominant view." (Klaus Mainzer, "Thinking in Complexity", 1994)
"How surprising it is that the laws of nature and the initial conditions of the universe should allow for the existence of beings who could observe it. Life as we know it would be impossible if any one of several physical quantities had slightly different values." (Steven Weinberg, "Life in the Quantum Universe", Scientific American, 1995)
"Unlike classical mathematics, net math exhibits nonintuitive traits. In general, small variations in input in an interacting swarm can produce huge variations in output. Effects are disproportional to causes - the butterfly effect." (Kevin Kelly, "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World", 1995)
"Small changes in the initial conditions in a chaotic system produce dramatically different evolutionary histories. It is because of this sensitivity to initial conditions that chaotic systems are inherently unpredictable. To predict a future state of a system, one has to be able to rely on numerical calculations and initial measurements of the state variables. Yet slight errors in measurement combined with extremely small computational errors (from roundoff or truncation) make prediction impossible from a practical perspective. Moreover, small initial errors in prediction grow exponentially in chaotic systems as the trajectories evolve. Thus, theoretically, prediction may be possible with some chaotic processes if one is interested only in the movement between two relatively close points on a trajectory. When longer time intervals are involved, the situation becomes hopeless."(Courtney Brown, "Chaos and Catastrophe Theories", 1995)
"Swarm systems generate novelty for three reasons: (1) They are 'sensitive to initial conditions' - a scientific shorthand for saying that the size of the effect is not proportional to the size of the cause - so they can make a surprising mountain out of a molehill. (2) They hide countless novel possibilities in the exponential combinations of many interlinked individuals. (3) They don’t reckon individuals, so therefore individual variation and imperfection can be allowed. In swarm systems with heritability, individual variation and imperfection will lead to perpetual novelty, or what we call evolution." (Kevin Kelly, "Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems and the Economic World", 1995)
"What is chaos? Everyone has an impression of what the word means, but scientifically chaos is more than random behavior, lack of control, or complete disorder. [...] Scientifically, chaos is defined as extreme sensitivity to initial conditions. If a system is chaotic, when you change the initial state of the system by a tiny amount you change its future significantly." (Barry R Parker, "Chaos in the Cosmos: The stunning complexity of the universe", 1996)
"Surveying the bewildering damage from some historical hurricanes, an outside observer might wonder whether builders were suffering under the illusion of a chaos-free environment: one governed by underestimated deterministic forces. Of course, in reality, dynamical chaos is intrinsic to the atmosphere, and contributes significantly to the aleatory uncertainty in wind loading. It may take more than the flap of a butterfly’s wings to change a hurricane forecast, but chaos imposes a fundamental practical limit to windstorm prediction capability." (Gordon Woo, "The mathematics of natural catastrophes", 1999)
"The classic example of chaos at work is in the weather. If you could measure the positions and motions of all the atoms in the air at once, you could predict the weather perfectly. But computer simulations show that tiny differences in starting conditions build up over about a week to give wildly different forecasts. So weather predicting will never be any good for forecasts more than a few days ahead, no matter how big (in terms of memory) and fast computers get to be in the future. The only computer that can simulate the weather is the weather; and the only computer that can simulate the Universe is the Universe." (John Gribbin, "The Little Book of Science", 1999)
"Chaos theory reconciles our intuitive sense of free will with the deterministic laws of nature. However, it has an even deeper philosophical ramification. Not only do we have freedom to control our actions, but also the sensitivity to initial conditions implies that even our smallest act can drastically alter the course of history, for better or for worse. Like the butterfly flapping its wings, the results of our behavior are amplified with each day that passes, eventually producing a completely different world than would have existed in our absence!" (Julien C Sprott, "Strange Attractors: Creating Patterns in Chaos", 2000)
"In chaology, the initial conditions are likely to be out of all proportion to the consequences; indeed, origins are much more random, unpredictable, and unknowable and seemingly much less directly causal than in orderly systems. The sensitive dependence upon initial conditions means that similar phenomena or systems will never be wholly identical and that the results of those small initial changes may be radically different. These unpredictable initial conditions may, for instance, lead to the so-called butterfly effect, in which an extremely minor and remote act causes disruptions of a huge magnitude."
(Gordon E Slethaug, "Beautiful Chaos: Chaos theory and metachaotics in recent American fiction", 2000)
"In chaos theory this 'butterfly effect' highlights the extreme sensitivity of nonlinear systems at their bifurcation points. There the slightest perturbation can push them into chaos, or into some quite different form of ordered behavior. Because we can never have total information or work to an infinite number of decimal places, there will always be a tiny level of uncertainty that can magnify to the point where it begins to dominate the system. It is for this reason that chaos theory reminds us that uncertainty can always subvert our attempts to encompass the cosmos with our schemes and mathematical reasoning."
"Incidentally, the butterfly effect also has a good side to it. Since a butterfly in Brazil can disturb the serene weather in Florida, the same butterfly could calm a hurricane in Texas by simply flapping its wings in a certain fashion. This process is called 'controlling chaos' and has been put to use with some success in dealing with heart fibrillation. By applying small shocks at precisely the right moment, an erratic heartbeat can be regularized and a heart attack avoided." (George Szpiro, "Kepler’s Conjecture", 2002)
"A depressing corollary of the butterfly effect (or so it was widely believed) was that two chaotic systems could never synchronize with each other. Even if you took great pains to start them the same way, there would always be some infinitesimal difference in their initial states. Normally that small discrepancy would remain small for a long time, but in a chaotic system, the error cascades and feeds on itself so swiftly that the systems diverge almost immediately, destroying the synchronization. Unfortunately, it seemed, two of the most vibrant branches of nonlinear science - chaos and sync - could never be married. They were fundamentally incompatible."
"A sudden change in the evolutive dynamics of a system (a ‘surprise’) can emerge, apparently violating a symmetrical law that was formulated by making a reduction on some (or many) finite sequences of numerical data. This is the crucial point. As we have said on a number of occasions, complexity emerges as a breakdown of symmetry (a system that, by evolving with continuity, suddenly passes from one attractor to another) in laws which, expressed in mathematical form, are symmetrical. Nonetheless, this breakdown happens. It is the surprise, the paradox, a sort of butterfly effect that can highlight small differences between numbers that are very close to one another in the continuum of real numbers; differences that may evade the experimental interpretation of data, but that may increasingly amplify in the system’s dynamics." (Cristoforo S Bertuglia & Franco Vaio, "Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Complexity: The Dynamics of Natural and Social Systems", 2003)
"At the basis of the impossibility of making reliable predictions for systems such as the atmosphere, there is a phenomenon known today as the butterfly effect. This deals with the progressive limitless magnification of the slightest imprecision (error) present in the measurement of the initial data (the incomplete knowledge of the current state of each molecule of air), which, although in principle negligible, will increasingly expand during the course of the model’s evolution, until it renders any prediction on future states (atmospheric weather conditions when the forecast refers to more than a few days ahead) completely insignificant, as these states appear completely different from the calculated ones." (Cristoforo S Bertuglia & Franco Vaio, "Nonlinearity, Chaos, and Complexity: The Dynamics of Natural and Social Systems", 2003)
"The butterfly effect came to be the most familiar icon of the new science, and appropriately so, for it is the signature of chaos. […] The idea is that in a chaotic system, small disturbances grow exponentially fast, rendering long-term prediction impossible."
"These, then, are the defining features of chaos: erratic, seemingly random behavior in an otherwise deterministic system; predictability in the short run, because of the deterministic laws; and unpredictability in the long run, because of the butterfly effect."
"An apparent paradox is that chaos is deterministic, generated by fixed rules which do not themselves involve any elements of change. We even speak of deterministic chaos. In principle, the future is completely determined by the past; but in practice small uncertainties, much like minute errors of measurement which enter into calculations, are amplified, with the effect that even though the behavior is predictable in the short term, it is unpredictable over the long term." (Heinz-Otto Peitgen et al, "Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science" 2nd Ed., 2004)
"Chaos theory, for example, uses the metaphor of the ‘butterfly effect’. At critical times in the formation of Earth’s weather, even the fluttering of the wings of a butterfly sends ripples that can tip the balance of forces and set off a powerful storm. Even the smallest inanimate objects sent back into the past will inevitably change the past in unpredictable ways, resulting in a time paradox." (Michio Kaku, "Parallel Worlds", 2004)
"Natural laws, and for that matter determinism, do not exclude the possibility of chaos. In other words, determinism and predictability are not equivalent. And what is an even more surprising rinding of recent chaos theory has been the discovery that these effects are observable in many systems which are much simpler than the weather. [...] Moreover, chaos and order (i.e., the causality principle) can be observed in juxtaposition within the same system. There may be a linear progression of errors characterizing a deterministic system which is governed by the causality principle, while (in the same system) there can also be an exponential progression of errors (i.e., the butterfly effect) indicating that the causality principle breaks down." (Heinz-Otto Peitgen et al, "Chaos and Fractals: New Frontiers of Science" 2nd Ed., 2004)
"[…] some systems (system is just a jargon for anything, like the swinging pendulum or the Solar System, or water dripping from a tap) are very sensitive to their starting conditions, so that a tiny difference in the initial ‘push’ you give them causes a big difference in where they end up, and there is feedback, so that what a system does affects its own behavior."(John Gribbin, "Deep Simplicity", 2004)
"We often wonder why the more complex systems seem to indicate a preferred direction of time, or an arrow of time, whereas their elementary counterparts do not. […] This has to do with the if-then nature of physics questions. Anything we observe involves laws of motion but also particular initial conditions. […] The initial conditions are what make a situation look peculiar when we time reverse it." (Leon M Lederman & Christopher T Hill, "Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe", 2004)
"[…] we would like to observe that the butterfly effect lies at the root of many events which we call random. The final result of throwing a dice depends on the position of the hand throwing it, on the air resistance, on the base that the die falls on, and on many other factors. The result appears random because we are not able to take into account all of these factors with sufficient accuracy. Even the tiniest bump on the table and the most imperceptible move of the wrist affect the position in which the die finally lands. It would be reasonable to assume that chaos lies at the root of all random phenomena." (Iwo Białynicki-Birula & Iwona Białynicka-Birula, "Modeling Reality: How Computers Mirror Life", 2004)
"Much of chaos as a science is connected with the notion of ‘sensitive dependence on initial conditions.’ Technically, scientists term as ‘chaotic’ those nonrandom complicated motions that exhibit a very rapid growth of errors that, despite perfect determinism, inhibits any pragmatic ability to render accurate long-term prediction. […] The most important fact is that there is a discernibly precise ‘moment’, with a corresponding behavior, which is neither chaotic nor nonchaotic, at which this transition occurs. Yes, errors do grow, but only in a marginally predictable, rather than in an unpredictable, fashion. In this state of marginal predictability inheres embryonically all the seeds of the chaotic behavior to come. That is, this transitional point, the legitimate child of universality, without full-fledged sensitive dependence upon initial conditions, knows fully how to dictate to its progeny in turn how this latter phenomenon must unfold. For a certain range of possible behaviors of strongly nonlinear systems - specifically, this range surrounding the transition to chaos - the information obtained just at the transition point fully organizes the spectrum of behaviors that these chaotic systems can exhibit." (Ray Kurzweil, "The Singularity is Near", 2005)
"Of course, the existence of an unknown butterfly flapping its wings has no direct bearing on weather forecasts, since it will take far too long for such a small perturbation to grow to a significant size, and we have many more immediate uncertainties to worry about. So, the direct impact of this phenomenon on weather prediction is often somewhat overstated." (James Annan & William Connolley, “Chaos and Climate”, 2005) [Link]
"Chaos can leave statistical footprints that look like noise. This can arise from simple systems that are deterministic and not random. [...] The surprising mathematical fact is that most systems are chaotic. Change the starting value ever so slightly and soon the system wanders off on a new chaotic path no matter how close the starting point of the new path was to the starting point of the old path. Mathematicians call this sensitivity to initial conditions but many scientists just call it the butterfly effect. And what holds in math seems to hold in the real world - more and more systems appear to be chaotic." (Bart Kosko, "Noise", 2006)
"'Chaos' refers to systems that are very sensitive to small changes in their inputs. A minuscule change in a chaotic communication system can flip a 0 to a 1 or vice versa. This is the so-called butterfly effect: Small changes in the input of a chaotic system can produce large changes in the output. Suppose a butterfly flaps its wings in a slightly different way. can change its flight path. The change in flight path can in time change how a swarm of butterflies migrates." (Bart Kosko, "Noise", 2006)
"Physically, the stability of the dynamics is characterized by the sensitivity to initial conditions. This sensitivity can be determined for statistically stationary states, e.g. for the motion on an attractor. If this motion demonstrates sensitive dependence on initial conditions, then it is chaotic. In the popular literature this is often called the 'Butterfly Effect', after the famous 'gedankenexperiment' of Edward Lorenz: if a perturbation of the atmosphere due to a butterfly in Brazil induces a thunderstorm in Texas, then the dynamics of the atmosphere should be considered as an unpredictable and chaotic one. By contrast, stable dependence on initial conditions means that the dynamics is regular." (Ulrike Feudel et al, "Strange Nonchaotic Attractors", 2006)
"This phenomenon, common to chaos theory, is also known as sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Just a small change in the initial conditions can drastically change the long-term behavior of a system. Such a small amount of difference in a measurement might be considered experimental noise, background noise, or an inaccuracy of the equipment." (Greg Rae, Chaos Theory: A Brief Introduction, 2006)
"Global stability of an equilibrium removes the restrictions on the initial conditions. In global asymptotic stability, solutions approach the equilibrium for all initial conditions. [...] In a study of local stability, first equilibrium solutions are identified, then linearization techniques are applied to determine the behavior of solutions near the equilibrium. If the equilibrium is stable for any set of initial conditions, then this type of stability is referred to as global stability." (Linda J S Allen, "An Introduction to Mathematical Biology", 2007)
"Sensitive dependence on initial conditions is one of the criteria necessary for showing a solution to a difference equation exhibits chaotic behavior." (Linda J S Allen, "An Introduction to Mathematical Biology", 2007)
"The system is highly sensitive to some small changes and blows them up into major alterations in weather patterns. This is popularly known as the butterfly effect in that it is possible for a butterfly to flap its wings in São Paolo, so making a tiny change to air pressure there, and for this tiny change to escalate up into a hurricane over Miami. You would have to measure the flapping of every butterfly’s wings around the earth with infinite precision in order to be able to make long-term forecasts. The tiniest error made in these measurements could produce spurious forecasts. However, short-term forecasts are possible because it takes time for tiny differences to escalate." (Ralph D Stacey, "Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity" 5th Ed., 2007)
"Yet, with the discovery of the butterfly effect in chaos theory, it is now understood that there is some emergent order over time even in weather occurrence, so that weather prediction is not next to being impossible as was once thought, although the science of meteorology is far from the state of perfection." (Peter Baofu, "The Future of Complexity: Conceiving a Better Way to Understand Order and Chaos", 2007)
"The ‘butterfly effect’ is at most a hypothesis, and it was certainly not Lorenz’s intention to change it to a metaphor for the importance of small event.” (Péter Érdi, "Complexity Explained", 2008)
"A characteristic of such chaotic dynamics is an extreme sensitivity to initial conditions (exponential separation of neighboring trajectories), which puts severe limitations on any forecast of the future fate of a particular trajectory. This sensitivity is known as the ‘butterfly effect’: the state of the system at time t can be entirely different even if the initial conditions are only slightly changed, i.e., by a butterfly flapping its wings." (Hans J Korsch et al, "Chaos: A Program Collection for the PC", 2008)
"Prior to the discovery of the butterfly effect it was generally believed that small differences averaged out and were of no real significance. The butterfly effect showed that small things do matter. This has major implications for our notions of predictability, as over time these small differences can lead to quite unpredictable outcomes. For example, first of all, can we be sure that we are aware of all the small things that affect any given system or situation? Second, how do we know how these will affect the long-term outcome of the system or situation under study? The butterfly effect demonstrates the near impossibility of determining with any real degree of accuracy the long term outcomes of a series of events." (Elizabeth McMillan, Complexity, "Management and the Dynamics of Change: Challenges for practice", 2008)
"The butterfly effect demonstrates that complex dynamical systems are highly responsive and interconnected webs of feedback loops. It reminds us that we live in a highly interconnected world. Thus our actions within an organization can lead to a range of unpredicted responses and unexpected outcomes. This seriously calls into doubt the wisdom of believing that a major organizational change intervention will necessarily achieve its pre-planned and highly desired outcomes. Small changes in the social, technological, political, ecological or economic conditions can have major implications over time for organizations, communities, societies and even nations." (Elizabeth McMillan, "Complexity, Management and the Dynamics of Change: Challenges for practice", 2008)
"The 'butterfly effect' is at most a hypothesis, and it was certainly not Lorenz’s intention to change it to a metaphor for the importance of small event. […] Dynamical systems that exhibit sensitive dependence on initial conditions produce remarkably different solutions for two initial values that are close to each other. Sensitive dependence on initial conditions is one of the properties to exhibit chaotic behavior. In addition, at least one further implicit assumption is that the system is bounded in some finite region, i.e., the system cannot blow up. When one uses expanding dynamics, a way of pull-back of too much expanded phase volume to some finite domain is necessary to get chaos." (Péter Érdi, "Complexity Explained", 2008)
"Chaos has three primary features: unpredictability, boundedness, and sensitivity to initial conditions. Unpredictability means that a sequence of numbers that is generated from a chaotic function does not repeat. This principle is perhaps a matter of degree, because some of the numbers could look as though they are recurring only because they are rounded to a convenient number of decimal points. [...] Boundedness means that, for all the unpredictability of motion, all points remain within certain boundaries. The principle of sensitivity to initial conditions means that two points that start off as arbitrarily close together become exponentially farther away from each other as the iteration process proceeds. This is a clear case of small differences producing a huge effect." (Stephen J Guastello & Larry S Liebovitch, "Introduction to Nonlinear Dynamics and Complexity" [in "Chaos and Complexity in Psychology"], 2009)
"A system of equations is deemed most elegant if it contains no un- necessary terms or parameters and if the parameters that remain have a minimum of digits. [...] Just as one can find the most elegant set of parameters for a given system, it is possible to find the most elegant set of initial conditions within the basin of attraction or chaotic sea. However, it is usually more useful to have initial conditions that are close to the attractor to reduce the transients that would otherwise occur." (Julien C Sprott, "Elegant Chaos: Algebraically Simple Chaotic Flows", 2010)
"Another property of bounded systems is that, unless the trajectory attracts to an equilibrium point where it stalls and remains forever, the points must continue moving forever with the flow. However, if we consider two initial conditions separated by a small distance along the direction of the flow, they will maintain their average separation forever since they are subject to the exact same flow but only delayed slightly in time. This fact implies that one of the Lyapunov exponents for a bounded continuous flow must be zero unless the flow attracts to a stable equilibrium." (Julien C Sprott, "Elegant Chaos: Algebraically Simple Chaotic Flows", 2010)
"In a chaotic system, there must be stretching to cause the exponential separation of initial conditions but also folding to keep the trajectories from moving off to infinity. The folding requires that the equations of motion contain at least one nonlinearity, leading to the important principle that chaos is a property unique to nonlinear dynamical systems. If a system of equations has only linear terms, it cannot exhibit chaos no matter how complicated or high-dimensional it may be." (Julien C Sprott, "Elegant Chaos: Algebraically Simple Chaotic Flows", 2010)
"Most systems in nature are inherently nonlinear and can only be described by nonlinear equations, which are difficult to solve in a closed form. Non-linear systems give rise to interesting phenomena such as chaos, complexity, emergence and self-organization. One of the characteristics of non-linear systems is that a small change in the initial conditions can give rise to complex and significant changes throughout the system. This property of a non-linear system such as the weather is known as the butterfly effect where it is purported that a butterfly flapping its wings in Japan can give rise to a tornado in Kansas. This unpredictable behaviour of nonlinear dynamical systems, i.e. its extreme sensitivity to initial conditions, seems to be random and is therefore referred to as chaos. This chaotic and seemingly random behaviour occurs for non-linear deterministic system in which effects can be linked to causes but cannot be predicted ahead of time." (Robert K Logan, "The Poetry of Physics and The Physics of Poetry", 2010)
"The objectivist view is that probabilities are real aspects of the universe - propensities of objects to behave in certain ways - rather than being just descriptions of an observer’s degree of belief. For example, the fact that a fair coin comes up heads with probability 0.5 is a propensity of the coin itself. In this view, frequentist measurements are attempts to observe these propensities. Most physicists agree that quantum phenomena are objectively probabilistic, but uncertainty at the macroscopic scale - e.g., in coin tossing - usually arises from ignorance of initial conditions and does not seem consistent with the propensity view." (Stuart J Russell & Peter Norvig, "Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach", 2010)
"The main defining feature of chaos is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions. Two nearby initial conditions on the attractor or in the chaotic sea separate by a distance that grows exponentially in time when averaged along the trajectory, leading to long-term unpredictability. The Lyapunov exponent is the average rate of growth of this distance, with a positive value signifying sensitive dependence (chaos), a zero value signifying periodicity (or quasiperiodicity), and a negative value signifying a stable equilibrium." (Julien C Sprott, "Elegant Chaos: Algebraically Simple Chaotic Flows", 2010)
"Complexity carries with it a lack of predictability different to that of chaotic systems, i.e. sensitivity to initial conditions. In the case of complexity, the lack of predictability is due to relevant interactions and novel information created by them." (Carlos Gershenson, "Understanding Complex Systems", 2011)
"The key characteristic of 'chaotic solutions' is their sensitivity to initial conditions: two sets of initial conditions close together can generate very different solution trajectories, which after a long time has elapsed will bear very little relation to each other. Twins growing up in the same household will have a similar life for the childhood years but their lives may diverge completely in the fullness of time. Another image used in conjunction with chaos is the so-called 'butterfly effect' - the metaphor that the difference between a butterfly flapping its wings in the southern hemisphere (or not) is the difference between fine weather and hurricanes in Europe." (Tony Crilly, "Fractals Meet Chaos" [in "Mathematics of Complexity and Dynamical Systems"], 2012)
"The most basic tenet of chaos theory is that a small change in initial conditions - a butterfly flapping its wings in Brazil - can produce a large and unexpected divergence in outcomes - a tornado in Texas. This does not mean that the behavior of the system is random, as the term 'chaos' might seem to imply. Nor is chaos theory some modern recitation of Murphy’s Law ('whatever can go wrong will go wrong'). It just means that certain types of systems are very hard to predict." (Nate Silver, "The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-but Some Don't", 2012)
"One of the remarkable features of these complex systems created by replicator dynamics is that infinitesimal differences in starting positions create vastly different patterns. This sensitive dependence on initial conditions is often called the butterfly-effect aspect of complex systems - small changes in the replicator dynamics or in the starting point can lead to enormous differences in outcome, and they change one’s view of how robust the current reality is. If it is complex, one small change could have led to a reality that is quite different." (David Colander & Roland Kupers, "Complexity and the art of public policy : solving society’s problems from the bottom up", 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment